10.1 King Hammurabi of Babylon
;
King Hammurabi of Babylon
King Hammurabi
of Babylon was destined for kingship since
time immemorial, when two powerful gods,
Anu and Enlil, entrusted to a third god, Marduk,
control over destiny, on Earth as in
heaven. At that time, too, the gods set Babylon
above all other lands, and its rule was made
everlasting. Here is how Hammurabi describes
himself on an inscribed black basalt stele we
have come to call the Code of Hammurabi:
At that time, to give happiness to the people,
Anum and Enlil pronounced my name "Hammurabi,"
me, the pious and god-fearing ruler, to decree
equity in the land, to eradicate the wicked
and the evil so that the powerful might not oppress
the powerless, to rise like Shamash and illumine
the land for the black-headed (people).
Primordial selection, self-praise, and dedication
to justice combine readily in Mesopotamian
tradition: before Hammurabi at least
two kings, Ur-Nammu of Ur (III) and LipitIshtar
of Isin, cover the same ground, albeit
more succinctly, in the prologues to legal prescriptions
they issued for their own people. If
we treat the three components of such sentiments
separately, we may note that the first
two items-divine preference and boast-are
quasi-formulaic in Mesopotamian monumental
royal inscriptions; indeed they are featured in
inscriptions of rulers who, we now know, had
every reason to be modest about themselves.
That these two elements seem to us more apgOl
propriate to Hammurabi is doubtless because
in books on world history, on the art of antiquity,
on the evolution of consciousness, or on
the spirit or ethics of law, we have long since
conceded to this Babylonian king the third
attribute: champion of justice. Indeed, "Hammurabi"
and "Lawgiver" have come to be practically
synonymous in most modern publications.
BABYLON
Hammurabi, who ruled from 1792 to 1750 BCE,
came to the throne almost a hundred years after
his ancestor Sumu-abum established his dynasty
at Babylon in 1894. At that time Babylon
was no major power, but its political history
went back at least to the time of the Agade (Akkadian)
Dynasty. One of its kings, Shar-kalisharri,
built a temple to the deities Annunitum
and II-aba in Babylon. During the Ur III period
diverse persons were appointed ENSi, "governor,"
of Babylon. The name of the city was
written KA..DINGIR. (RA) in Sumerian, equivalent
to bab ilim in Akkadian, meaning "God's
Gate," a name it held throughout its history.
Whether or not "God's Gate" is itself folk etymology
on a very ancient and no-longerunderstood
name is still under discussion. During
Hammurabi's time, Babylon was also
known in written form as TIN.TIR, and there is a
History and Culture
"Hammurabi" or "Hammurapi"?
There is still a debate on how to read the king's
name, and for this reason you will often find two
spellings: "Hammurapi" and "HammurabL" It is
generally accepted that the name contains two elements:
hammu and rap/bi. The issue has gotten
complic~ted because some would treat the name as
Babylonian (East Semitic) and others as Amorite
(West Semitic). As the first element is undoubtedly
West Semitic, the second should also be treated as
such. But, at this point the problems mushroom.
The cuneiform script itself was invented for
Sumerian and adapted for Akkadian, so it is not well
suited to represent a number of consonants that occur
in Semitic languages. Scribes use five to six different
cuneiform signs to write the name, most often
spelling it ha+am+mu+ra+bi. The sign that we
transcribe h"a represents a number of Semitic phonemes
am~ng which were /:tet (a voiceless pharyngeal)
and cayin (a voiced pharyngeal). The difference
between them, however, is significant because the
"hammu-" element would mean "heat" (hence
"Sun") if the first consonant was heard as a het (but
possibly also "father-in-law"), but "people, nation"
or "paternal uncle, kinsman" if heard as an cayin. For
the second element of the name, "mighty, vast"
would be its meaning if read -rabi, but something to
do with healing if read -rapi.
In older literature, the tendency was to differ on
the meaning of the first element (hence "Sun" or
"[Divine] Kinsman") but to understand the second
element as -rabi. But because some scholars conlikelihood
that before the Agade period, it had
a name that was pronounced *Baballr but
written BAR.KI.BAR. In Hebrew the city was
called babel, allegedly because God "confounded
(balal) , the speech of the whole earth"
(Genesis 11:9); but we get our own name for
the city from the Greek translation of the Bible,
the Septuagint, where it was written babylon.
Babylon sat astride the Arakhtum-either a
branch of the Euphrates or the great river itself
before it shifted its route-and its soil could be
among the most fertile in the ancient world if
constantly worked and watered. Its ruins are
divided among a number of tells that are now
partially walled-off for display to tourists visiting
Iraq; but the immense remains that are still
902
nected the Babylonian Hammurabi with a king of
Shinar named Amraphel (Genesis 14), they opted for
-rapi as the second element. When documents in alphabetic
cuneiform were recovered from Ugarit (Ras
Shamra) in the 1930S, a number of its kings of the
second half of the second millennium were seen to
be named cmrp, and this spelling was retrojected on
the name of the famous king of Babylon, thus leading
many to read his name cammu + rapi, meaning
"The (Divine) Kinsman/Uncle heals."
This interpretation is possible; but in this chapter
(as in the Cidlizations of the Ancient Near East reference
set), the traditional "Hammurabi" is kept because
there is no reason to assume that in different
cultures names with homonymic components must
have the same meaning. Moreover, Mesopotamian
scribes exclusively used the sign for the syllable -bi
in "Hammurabi" (as almost always in other names
with -rabi) even when they had another sign for -pi.
In the West, in Alalakh (modem Tell Atchana),
scribes would sometime use GAL, the Sumerian word
meaning "vast, large," instead of the -rabi element
in "Hammurabi." Finally, in Babylonian traditions,
presumably closer to a truer understanding of the
meaning of the name, "Hammurabi" was understood
as kimta rapastu, "Vast Nation," again favoring -rabi
as the second element.
Moral: It is all right for people to use either spelling,
provided that they not become dogmatic about their
choice.
to be seen there are those of first millennium
No comments:
Post a Comment